Thursday, December 5, 2013

Week 10 EOC: Lawyer jokes

Q: How many lawyer jokes are there?
A: Just two, all the rest are true.

Q: What’s the difference between a lawyer and a herd of buffalo?
A: The lawyer charges more.

What's the difference between a good lawyer and a great lawyer?
A good lawyer knows the law. A great lawyer knows the judge.


A new client had just come in to see a famous lawyer.
"Can you tell me how much you charge?", said the client.
"Of course", the lawyer replied, "I charge $200 to answer three questions!"
"Well that's a bit steep, isn't it?"
"Yes it is", said the lawyer, "And what's your third question?"


The Hundred-Dollar Bill.
Santa Claus, the tooth fairy, an honest lawyer, and an old drunk were walking along when they simultaneously spotted a hundred-dollar bill laying in the street. Who gets it?
The old drunk, of course, the other three are mythological creatures.

Week 9 EOC: Crimes


1.   Lying under Oath

2.     Reckless Driving


Your Own Argument and Opinions

In conclusion, it was an interesting experience trying to figure out what questions to ask and contacting the lawyers. Although the specific lawyers that I found weren't of much help, they were still very kind and professional with me. This experience has taught me, that If I ever face any type of legal issues with my business or intellectual property, I will know exactly what type of lawyer I need to talk to and I won’t have to waste time trying to contact different kinds of lawyers.

"For much of history, land was the most valuable form of property. It was the primary source of wealth and social status. Today, intellectual property is a major source of wealth. New ideas—for manufacturing processes, computer programs, medicines, books—bring both affluence and influence." (Cengage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law, Page: 502)

Overall, I think the people who answered the questions on the internet did a decent job in summarizing the law but obviously, I do not recommend taking serious advice from the internet. I would recommend doing research on your own but in the end it’s best to actually get a lawyer and confirming your options with the lawyer before making any decisions. "Most people do not hire a lawyer to read form contracts. And without an experienced lawyer, it is highly unlikely that an individual would be aware of ambiguities." (Cengage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law, Page: 6)

For the most part, I agree with the rulings and the law when it comes to copyrights and intellectual property because it is fair and the law is there for a reason. I believe the reason is to protect artist and business owners like us. As long as we abide by the law, then we are in favor.

"Binding legal ideas often come from the courts. Judges generally follow precedent. When courts decide a case, they tend to apply the same legal rules that other courts have used in similar cases. The principle that precedent is binding on later cases is stare decisis, which means “let the decision stand.” Stare decisis makes the law predictable, and this in turn enables businesses and private citizens to plan intelligently." (Cengage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law, Page: 6)


"We depend upon the law to give us a stable nation and economy, a fair society, a safe place to live and work. But while law is a vital tool for crafting the society we want, there are no easy answers about how to create it. In a democracy, we all participate in the crafting. Legal rules control us, yet we create them. A working knowledge of the law can help build a successful career—and a solid democracy."(Cengage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law, Page: 12)



Rule of law

How can photographers protect themselves from being sued?


Best protection is to learn a little about copyright law in whatever country you are doing your work. In the US, for example, things that are predominately functional cannot be copyrighted. For example, the design of clothing. But if you have a model in a shirt with an Andy Warhol painting on the front, then that would be trouble.

When in doubt, get a signed property release, just like you hopefully already do for model releases.

Also, if you are self-employed, hopefully you already have comprehensive business liability insurance. This often covers copyright infringement.“Insurance is available for virtually any risk. Bruce Springsteen insured his voice and Jamie Lee Curtis her legs. When Kerry Wallace shaved her head to promote the Star Trek films, she bought insurance in case her hair failed to grow back. Food critic Egon Ronay insured his taste buds. And an amateur dramatics group took out insurance to protect against the risk that a member of the audience might die laughing. Most people, however, get by with six different types of insurance: property, life, health, disability, liability, and automobile.” (Cengage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law, Page: 579)


What steps should I take if my photo is used without permission?

First, politely request that the photo be (a) credited or (b) taken down. If it has been used in a commercial sense, you could also include an invoice for an amount you feel comfortable charging.

If that doesn’t work, then try a firmer reply, including an extract from the part of the terms and conditions that have been breached, and mention that you will be taking legal advice if they do not comply.

At this point, if you’ve still had no joy, you could do one of two things: contact a lawyer and ask them to send a letter on your behalf. "If you do hire a lawyer, be aware of certain warning signs. Although the lawyer's goal is to protect you, a good attorney should be a deal-maker, not a deal-breaker. She should help you do what you want and, therefore, should never (or, at least, hardly ever) say, “You cannot do this.” Instead, she should say, “Here are the risks to this approach” or “Here is another way to achieve your goal.” (Cengage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law, Page: 208)


Failing that, you would probably have to go to the small claims court, to claim for non-payment of your invoice

"Anyone who uses copyrighted material without permission is violating the Copyright Act. To prove a violation, the plaintiff must present evidence that the work was original and that either:

•The infringer actually copied the work; or

• The infringer had access to the original and the two works are substantially similar.

Damages can be substantial. In a recent case, a jury ordered SAP to pay Oracle $1.3 billion for copyright infringement of Oracle's software."
(Cengage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law, Page: 507)

What are the legalities of accepting payments as a freelance photographer?

While it is possible to run a business as a sole proprietor (rather than creating a legal entity), I would recommend at the very least to get a separate checking account that she will use only for the business.“A sole proprietorship is an unincorporated business owned by one person. For example, Linda runs ExSciTe (which stands for Excellence in Science Teaching), a company that helps teachers prepare hands-on science experiments for the classroom.” (Cengage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law, Page: 373)


I would also recommend that your friend get a copy of quickbooks. She should produce invoices for her customers and bill them. The invoice should indicate the timeline for payment (net 30 days, upon receipt, 50% in advance, 50% upon delivery, etc.).

All cash flow (expenses and revenue) should go through the one bank account. This will make it easy for her to reconcile her taxable income and other needs at the end.

In terms of technology, check out Square. It has a low cost device that hooks to ipad / iphones that allows her to charge credit cards. This should be hooked to her bank account discussed above.

"The “method” refers to whether acceptance is done in person or by mail, telephone, email, or fax. The “manner” refers to whether the offeree accepts by promising, by making a down payment, by performing, and so forth. If an offer demands acceptance in a particular method or manner, the offeree must follow those requirements. An offer might specify that it be accepted in writing, or in person, or before midnight on June 23. An offeror can set any requirements she wishes. Omri might say to Oliver, “I'll sell you my bike for $200. You must accept my offer by standing on a chair in the lunchroom tomorrow and reciting a poem about a cow.” Oliver can only accept the offer in the exact manner specified if he wants to form a contract." (Cengage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law, Page: 156)


Is it legal to sell a photo of a hotel building or a sign of a public market?


1st best answer: To try and answer the question succinctly: yes it is legal to sell the photos, because you have copyright, but they may not be publishable depending on who buys them.

2nd best answer: Yes you can sell the photographs to whoever wants to buy them.

The problems are encountered when the images are used commercially in some design material or in an advertisement.


If an illustration of one of my photographs is made and used commercially or editorially, is it an infringement of my copyright?

Yes, if it is deemed to be a derivative work and the illustrator has copied your copyright-able elements."A work is copyrighted automatically once it is in tangible form. For example, when a songwriter puts notes on paper, the work is copyrighted without further ado. But if she whistles a happy tune without writing it down, the song is not copyrighted, and anyone else can use it without permission. Registration with the Copyright Office of the Library of Congress is necessary only if the holder wishes to bring suit to enforce the copyright. Although authors still routinely place the copyright symbol (©) on their works, such a precaution is not necessary in the United States. However, some lawyers still recommend using the copyright symbol because other countries recognize it. Also, the penalties for intentional copyright infringement are heavier than for unintentional violations, and the presence of a copyright notice is evidence that the infringer's actions were intentional." (Cengage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law, Page: 506)


How can I get permission to use copyrighted photography?

You may obtain a non-exclusive license from the copyright owner orally, but exclusive licenses must be in writing. It’s always best to put license agreements in writing, even if it’s only an email.


If you are shooting a movie/photo (non-profit or profit) with a willing person, should you get a contract signed from him/her?

1st best answer: Whenever possible you should get a model release (or a contract with a model release clause) from anyone who appears in your photos or video, this can save a lot of trouble in the future and has no downside.

2nd best answer: If you do not have a release (for property, too.) your images are unusable. You cannot display them in public. You cannot use them in your portfolio. You cannot use them.

"Contracts govern countless areas of our lives, from intimate family issues to multibillion dollar corporate deals. Understanding contract principles is essential for a successful business or a professional career and is invaluable in private life. Courts no longer rubber-stamp any agreement that two parties have made. If we know the issues that courts scrutinize, the agreement we draft is likelier to be enforced. We thus achieve greater control over our affairs—the very purpose of a contract." (Cengage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law, Page: 158)


Will electronic or digital model releases or contracts hold up in court?

For the most part, whether you're a business generating digital documents to be signed, or a consumer signing them with a mouse click, the answer is a definitive yes.

The U.S. government actually took the biggest step of resolving the legal issues of e-signatures back in 2000 with the ESIGN Act, which gave electronic signatures the same legal weight as handwritten ones. State law, for the most part, has followed suit in recognizing their validity.


What are the appropriate laws regarding taking candid or unsolicited shots of people in public places?

1st best answer: The gist is that with very few exceptions such as military installations you can photograph anyone and anything you see in public where people have no expectations of privacy. Images taken this way belong to you.

What you can do with these photos is quite restricted because the image in the photo belongs to someone else. Because of this you cannot use such images for most commercial purposes, including licensing such images, selling prints of it or making advertisement from them. You can use these images for editorial use. See the above link for what constitutes editorial use.

2nd best answer: You certainly can take those photos. It is your legal right. If they are out in public, there is no assumption of privacy.

However, you are limited in what you can do with those photos. You can not publish or sell them without a signed model release.


What are the most important issues to cover in a portrait photo contract?

· What's included in the price and what's not. Even if the session fee is waived, are the prints and/or images included? Or are they for extra purchase? If so, at what price

· How long you will retain the images for purchase/download/whatever. Will you hang onto the images for a year? more or less?

· Will photo editing (beyond basic cropping/color balance/basic touchups) be included or be at extra charge? For example, if a client wants you to remove an undesirable element from the background, etc.

· How many images the client can expect? I usually give a range.. for example, for an N minute session, you can expect x-y images.

· What kind of turnaround time clients can expect (do you turn over the photos in 24 hours, 1 week, 2 weeks, etc)

· If clients can buy/download digital images, what kind of rights do they have? You might want to specify personal use.


“A contract is merely a legally enforceable agreement. People regularly make promises, but only some of them are enforceable. For a contract to be enforceable, seven key characteristics must be present. We will study this “checklist” at length in the next several chapters.

• Offer. All contracts begin when a person or a company proposes a deal. It might involve buying something, selling something, doing a job, or anything else. But only proposals made in certain ways amount to a legally recognized offer.

• Acceptance. Once a party receives an offer, he must respond to it in a certain way. We will examine the requirements of both offers and acceptances in the next chapter.

• Consideration. There has to be bargaining that leads to an exchange between the parties. Contracts cannot be a one-way street; both sides must receive some measureable benefit.

• Legality. The contract must be for a lawful purpose. Courts will not enforce agreements to sell cocaine, for example.

• Capacity. The parties must be adults of sound mind.

• Consent. Certain kinds of trickery and force can prevent the formation of a contract.

• Writing. While verbal agreements often amount to contracts, some types of contracts must be in writing to be enforceable.”
(Cengage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law, Page: 143)

"Business people sometimes refer to their lawyers with terms like business prevention department. They may be reluctant to ask an attorney to draft a contract for fear of the time and expense that lawyers can inject into the process. And they worry that the lawyers will interfere in the business deal itself, at best causing unnecessary hindrance, at worst killing the deal. Part of the problem is that lawyers and clients have different views of the future."
(Cengage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law, Page: 208)

Reasoning of the Law

After analyzing my experience and encounter with the lawyers, I assume that they might have declined answering my questions because of personal issues such as, they didn't want to be responsible for the answers that they put out or they didn't want their names to be used in my assignment. Another reason could be that they didn't have the time or want to take the time to answer the questions. I understand that to them it could feel like a waste of time because normal they would get paid for what I wanted them to do for me. "It is enormously time-consuming and expensive for companies to locate all the relevant material, separate it from irrelevant or confidential matter, and furnish it. A firm may be obligated to furnish millions of emails to the opposing party. In one recent case, a defendant had to pay 31 lawyers full time for six months just to wade through an ocean of e-documents and figure out which had to be supplied and how to produce it. Not surprisingly, this data eruption has created a new industry: high-tech companies that assist law firms in finding, sorting, and delivering electronic data." (Cengage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law, Page: 43)
Fortunately, I had better luck and better answers after researching on my own. The answers are legal advice from actual people or lawyers who have answered questions that have been posted in blogs or forums. I thoroughly read all the answers and picked the ones that were most professional and accurate. I based my judgment off of common sense, research, and knowledge that I've gained thus far.

I believe that the thinking process and logic behind the people that posted these answers is that they are experienced photographers who have been in the field for many years and have personally dealt with legal issues and want to pass on their knowledge. It is also possible that the answers came from people who practice law or know a lot about the law and either they truly like to give legal advice or they agreed to answer questions in order to get their name out and gain more clients.


The Questions

These are the ten questions that I chose to ask. I wanted to base the questions on my major, which is photography, and how it ties in with business law, and copy right law. I figured If I asked these questions, the answers would come in handy for my career in the future.

“Copyright- Under federal law, the holder of a copyright owns a particular expression of an idea, but not the idea itself. This ownership right applies to creative activities such as literature, music, drama, and software” (Cengage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law, Page: G16)
“The holder of a copyright owns the particular expression of an idea, but not the underlying idea or method of operation. Abner Doubleday could have copyrighted a book setting out his particular version of the rules of baseball, but he could not have copyrighted the rules themselves, nor could he have required players to pay him a royalty.” (Cengage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law, Page: 506)
“Unlike patents, the ideas underlying copyrighted material need not be novel. For example, three movies—Like Father Like Son, Vice Versa, and Freaky Friday—are about a parent and child who switch bodies. The movies all have the same plot, but there is no copyright violation because their expressions of the basic idea are different.” (Cengage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law, Page: 506)
How can photographers protect themselves from being sued?


What steps should I take if my photo is used without permission?


What are the legalities of accepting payments as a freelance photographer?


Is it legal to sell a photo of a hotel building or a sign of a public market?


If an illustration of one of my photographs is made and used commercially or editorially, is it an infringement of my copyright?


How can I get permission to use copyrighted photography?


If you are shooting a movie/photo (non-profit or profit) with a willing person, should you get a contract signed from him/her?


Will electronic or digital model releases or contracts hold up in court?


What are the appropriate laws regarding taking candid or unsolicited shots of people in public places?


What are the most important issues to cover in a portrait photo contract?

Legal Authority

When I first found out about this assignment, my initial thought was to contact a family friend who is a lawyer. Her name is Jennifer Adams (name changed to protect identity) and I figured she might be of help because she hasn't been out of school for very long and she recently passed her BAR exam and started working in a law firm. I assumed that she might be the perfect candidate to answer my questions so I contacted her, briefly told her about the assignment and told her to expect an email from me. She told me right away that she was glad to help and she agreed to communicate with me via email. In the email, I thoroughly explain the assignment in great detail and I listed the ten questions that I came up with.

She responded the very next day and she was still very enthusiastic about helping me, but unfortunately she couldn't be of much help towards this specific topic. She wrote back saying that she would not be able to answer my questions because the questions were not in her field of expertise. I understood her reasoning behind her response because my questions mostly had to do with intellectual property and copyright issues within the photography business, and it takes a specific type of lawyer to know the answers right off the bat. She told me that intellectual property is a very specialized and specific area of law but she didn't want to leave my questions unanswered and she still wanted to help. She mentioned that she knows an intellectual property lawyer and she offered to discuss the questions with him. She promised to get back to me right away as soon as she spoke to him but I knew that changing my lawyer at this point in time would be a major setback. I agreed with her suggestion and I thanked her for her help but I knew that I would have to start looking for a new lawyer just in case.

"One of the major challenges for legal institutions in regulating copyrights is simply that modern intellectual property is so easy to copy. Many consumers are in the habit of violating the law by downloading copyrighted material—music, movies and books—for free. They seem to believe that if it is easy to steal something, then the theft is somehow acceptable. In one survey of adolescents aged 12 to 17, 75 percent agreed with the statement, “file sharing is so easy to do, it's unrealistic to expect people not to do it.” (Cengage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law, Page: 508)
I still wanted to try and find someone who I personally knew because I figured that their answers would be more honest and genuine and they would want to spend more time answering my questions. I carefully thought about who else I might know that is a lawyer. Then it hit me that we have another family friend named, Tim Johnson (name changed to protect identity) who is a lawyer and a judge as well. I was sure that he would be able to answer my questions because he has many years of experience in the field and I figured he must know the law since he is a judge. I went through the same process as I did with Jennifer, and he also agreed to help me. I emailed him as well and he wrote back with a similar response to Jennifer’s. He said that the topic was out of his expertise and that it would take a lot of time and research on his part to be able to answer the questions.

In the mean time, I heard back from Jennifer and she told me that after speaking to the other lawyer, he said that he mostly deals with patent law and he does not know the answer to my questions either. Needless to say, my questions were viewed by three different lawyers and neither of them was able to give me answers. This experience has taught me that I would have to find a very specific lawyer, although my original understanding was that any lawyer would've been able to give me some kind of answer. By the time I got done contacting these lawyers, I realized that I was starting to run out of time to contact a completely new lawyer. I was left with very little time, still no lawyer, and unanswered questions. I had to take the matter into my own hands and find my own answers to the questions by researching. It wasn't what I originally had in mind but I was able to learn a lot just by researching, maybe even just as much as getting my answers from a lawyer.

Although things didn't go as planned, I do see the importance of talking to a lawyer and even hiring a lawyer for future business matters. “Business people are optimists—they believe that they have negotiated a great deal and everything is going to go well—sales will boom, the company will prosper. Lawyers have a different perspective—their primary goal is to protect their clients by avoiding litigation, now and in the future. For this reason, lawyers are trained to be pessimists—they try to foresee and protect against everything that can possibly go wrong. Business people sometimes view this lawyering as a waste of time and a potential deal-killer, but it may just save them from some dire failure.” 
(Cengage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law, Page: 208)
I have definitely considered getting a lawyer once I start my own business, for it will make my job a lot easier because in the end, we’re not lawyers, we’re artists!

Friday, November 22, 2013

Week 8 EOC: Bratz Brawl

After reading up on the whole Bratz doll and Mattel case, my opinion on it is that the whole thing is pretty ridiculous. “The Bratz dolls were designed by a former Mattel employee while he was still working on Barbie dolls for Mattel. So Mattel had claimed that it owned what this employee drew up. But the employee insisted he was drawing the Bratz dolls on nights and weekends so Mattel didn't own them. The jury here agreed with the designer that Mattel has no claim to the Bratz dolls.”(link) Although Carter Bryant was working for Mattel, he was working on the design for The Bratz dolls on the side. It’s not like he stole ideas from Mattel or Barbie and tried to sell it to another company. He testified that he came up with the idea back in 1998, when he was on a break from working at Mattel. “In court, MGA attorneys accused Mattel of trying to crush Bratz because the doll line was giving the venerable Barbie doll a run for her money, while Mattel accused MGA of stealing its idea for Bratz and then working to cover up any hint the concept wasn't theirs.”(link) The case has been an ongoing trial for nine years but I feel that Mattel filed for lawsuit for all the wrong reasons, and it turned out that Mattel was in the wrong because they were sending spies to MGA and they actually stole ideas from MGA. “The jury in the retrial said Mattel had not proved its claims of copyright infringement and instead found that the company had stolen trade secrets from MGA and owed it $88.5 million. That was seen as a paltry amount for a case that analysts estimated had cost each side hundreds of millions of dollars in legal fees alone.” (link)



Thursday, November 21, 2013

Week 8 EOC: Questions!

Does a creative commons license mean that I can use the photograph any way I want, for free?



What is the Digital Millennium Copyright Act?



What happens when a copyrighted photo is used without permission?



What are the legalities of accepting payments as a freelance photographer?



If an illustration of one of my photographs is made and used commercially or editorially, is it an infringement of my copyright?



What kinds of things do I need to do if I’m going to set up a business entity for my photography?

Is it legal to take pictures of buildings?



If you are shooting a movie/photo (non-profit or profit) with a willing person, should you get a contract signed from him/her?



Is there any situation where it is legal to post a photo taken in private property without permission?



What are the appropriate laws regarding taking candid or unsolicited shots of people in public places?

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Week 7 EOC: Lawyers



1) Name: Keith E. Gregory & Associates
    
    Address: 631 S 10th St, Las Vegas, NV 89101
    Number: (702) 979-4730


2) Name: Craig P Kenny & Associates
    Address: 501 S 8th St, Las Vegas, NV 89101 
    Number: (702) 380-2800


3) Name: Crystal Eller Attorney at Law
    Address: 8625 W Sahara Ave, Las Vegas, NV 89117
    Number: (702) 997-8770


4) Name: Gallo Law Office 
    Address: 818 S Casino Center Blvd, Las Vegas, NV 89101
    Number: (702) 509-9820

5) Name: Law Offices of Mandy McKellar     
    Address: 1404 S Jones Blvd, Las Vegas, NV 89146
    Number: (702) 816-5200

6) Name: Richard Harris Law Firm     
    Address: 801 S 4th St, Las Vegas, NV 89101
    Number: (702) 444-4444

7) Name: Law Office of Paul W. VanDerwerk    
    Address: 522 S 7th St, Las Vegas, NV 89101
    Number: (888) 283-2173

8) Name: Michael J. Warhola     
    Address: 625 S 6th St, Las Vegas, NV 89101
    Number: (702) 678-6699


9) Name: Las Vegas Law Offices of Snell & Wilmer
    Address: 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway    
    Suite 1100, Las Vegas, NV 89169-5958
    Number: (702) 784.5200


10) Name: Flangas McMillan Law Group
      Address: 3275 South Jones Blvd., Suite 105
      Las Vegas, NV 89146
      
      Number: (702) 307-9500

Thursday, November 7, 2013

Week 6 EOC: Supreme Court Prayer

This past Wednesday, the Supreme Court was debating over controversial issues about religion and prayer. This issue divided the court because clearly, religion is a very diverse and touchy subject. “The justices have struggled for decades to come up with a coherent set of rules for prayers conducted at government forums. Past decisions have allowed public bodies, including Congress, state legislatures and city councils, to open their meetings with prayers, but the justices have also ruled that public officials may not take actions that appear to endorse a specific set of religious beliefs.” link

The debate is about whether there should be prayer recited before meetings of the Town Board in Greece, N.Y. Two town residents, Susan Galloway and Linda Stephens, sued the town of Greece because they were required to sit through Christian prayer in order to attend meetings. The prayer was offered exclusively by Christians and this had been going on since 1999.

"It's very divisive when you bring government into religion," Stephens told CNN from her home. "I don't believe in God, and Susan is Jewish, so to hear these ministers talk about Jesus and even have some of them who personally question our motives, it's just not appropriate." link

In my opinion, I don’t think that it is fair to pick one religion and make everyone sit through a prayer when they aren't even a part of that religion. People need to remember that not everyone in America is Christian.

Today in Class, we experienced only a fraction of what the people that are involved in this case are dealing with and it was uncomfortable for not only myself but for a lot of the other students as well. I think it is disrespectful to others who aren't Christian; therefore everyone should just keep their religions to themselves and practice in their own home or on their own time, where they won’t have to force it upon others. Either they should take all religions into account or none at all.

“Greece is being backed by the Obama administration and many social and religious conservative groups in arguing that the court settled this issue 30 years ago when it held that an opening prayer is part of the nation's fabric and not a violation of the First Amendment. Some of those groups want the court to go further and get rid of legal rules that tend to rein in religious expression in the public sphere.” link

Saturday, November 2, 2013

Week 5 EOC: Challenges with modern internet


1. Identity theft

2. Catfishing

3. Privacy 

These are some of the legal challenges that we might face in this modern age where we are surrounded by technology and social media. With how advance things have come to be, it is very easy to face these problems and anyone can face them, especially if they aren't cautious. 


I can imagine that identity theft would be an issue that people would face if they are involved with any kind of social media website. As long as you have personal information and pictures on your website, anyone can easily steal that information and pose as you. They can post things on behalf of you and pretend to be you, which can really make a mess of things, and possibly cause a lot of trouble. “Kathleen Winn, director of the Community Outreach & Education Division in the Arizona Attorney General’s Office, said software that reveals a person’s location and tagging others in photos can also put friends and family at risk for identity theft. Winn recommended that people be discreet about social-media postings and to not friend strangers.”
(source) This is why people on social media sites need to be very careful about their privacy setting and what they post. Some people chose not to participate in social media because of this reason.

Catfishing is another major issue with the modern internet and it has become more recognized within the recent years. Catfishing is also pretending to be someone else but the term is used for people who pretend to be someone else while trying to find “romance” online. Often times, sexual predators catfish, in order to talk to young girls or boys online. This is where it becomes an issue because these young kids who are surrounded by technology think it is okay to talk to strangers online and they think that they might be talking to someone their age but in real life they are being targeted by sexual predators. Chris Duque, a former Police Detective who has been studying online predators for over thirty years, has created false personas to lure these types of suspects."It's easy to be duped online, very easy," Duque said. "The thing with the Internet is your five senses are somewhat limited and what you see online may not be what you're really going to get."(source)

“When it comes to technology, courts and legal scholars can run into some thorny issues. For instance, when does someone have a right to film you and put those images online? And what can you do about it once those images are up there?” (source) The question that is asked here leads to a good point. With what the technology and social media world has come to, it is difficult to protect your privacy. If you’re on websites like face book, you’re feeding people information about yourself and people can use that against you and there is no sense of privacy left. Even if you’re not on Facebook, people can take pictures and videos of you and post them all over Facebook and there is really not much that you can do about it.


Thursday, October 24, 2013

Week 4 EOC: Copyrights

“Copyright law originated with the United States Constitution. In Article I, Section 8, the Constitution states that "Congress shall have the power...To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries".”
link

“Copyright is a form of protection provided by the laws of the United States to the creators of "original works" including literary works, movies, musical works, sound recordings, paintings, photographs, software, live performances, and television or sound broadcasts.” link
It is important to understand and copyright your work because it gives you, as the creator, the exclusive right to reproduce, display, and sell your work. It is easy to mistake copyrighting with patenting or trade marking but they are all different from one another. Copyrighting only protects your work, while patenting protects your ideas/discoveries, and trade marking protects words, phrases and symbols. It is important to understand the difference between the three because they will come in handy for artists like ourselves.

Copyrighting is important because without it, it gives other people the opportunity to steal and plagiarize your work. Without copyrighting, legally there is no way to prove that the work is yours and they can sell your work without being in the wrong, but if your work is copyrighted and someone steals it, you can easily take them to court and win the case.

As a photographer, I’m really starting to understand the importance of copyright laws because I put a lot of work and effort into creating my photographs and I deserve the right to my photos because after all, it is my work. Nowadays, anyone can easily steal other peoples work with face book and twitter being around but the difference between you getting screwed over and protecting your work is as simple as adding metadata to all your work. With programs like Adobe Bridge, it really is a simple process and it will save you the pain of having to deal with plagiarism. “Under the provisions of the revised copyright law, a photographer owns all rights to his pictures at the moment of creation. That means he and he alone owns the rights to sell, use, distribute copy, publish, alter or destroy his work of art. If you are a photographer, this ownership begins the moment you click the shutter. It continues throughout the life of the artist and 50 years after his or her death. In order to insure you have all the rights the law provides, as well as access to all the legal remedies available, you should have a copyright notice put on all of your published works.” link



Thursday, October 17, 2013

Week 3 EOC: Erin Brockovich

In 1996, the PG&E case that Erin Brockovich was investigating ended up with a settlement of 333 million dollars towards 650 residents of Hinkley, California, who suffered from health issues due to the water pollution. In 2006, there was a new settlement for 295 million dollars for more than 1,000 residents in the Mojave Desert towns who also suffered from the groundwater contamination. Along with the settlement the company included and apology to the residents that were affected by the pollution. "Clearly, this situation should never have happened, and we are sorry that it did. It is not the way we do business, and we believe it would not happen in our company today” (http://articles.latimes.com/2006/feb/04/local/me-erin4). The spokesman for the company, Jon Tremayne also added, "The differences between the plaintiffs and our company in the case centered on opposing views of the health science on chromium. Although the settlement does not resolve these differences, we believe it is best to move forward." (http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2006-02-06-pge-settlement-brockovich_x.htm)

"Many of these people truly suffered and money doesn't make that go away," Brockovich said in an interview. "But I hope it gives them a sense that they stood up for something; and I hope they can use the money to help with their medical conditions or to make their lives easier." (http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2006-02-06-pge-settlement-brockovich_x.htm).
I agree with what Erin Brockovich said in that statement because no amount of money can reverse a lot of the health issues that the residents of Hinkley had to suffer but the water contamination issue was something that needed to be resolved. The case dated way back to 1951 but it wasn't being pursued or investigated like it should have been. I assume that even if the people who lived around there and the law firms in that area had a slight idea of what was going on, they just let it slide or were too intimidated to even investigate the case because they felt like they didn't stand a chance against a multi-billion dollar company. I think what Erin Brockovich did, needed to be done in order to prevent future cases involving the health issues that came with the water contamination.

Thursday, October 10, 2013

Week 2 EOC: Supreme Court Issues

The Supreme Court issue that I chose to write about is the McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission case.

On October 8th, the Supreme Court heard the case of McCutcheon and RNC (Republican National Committee) v. Federal Election Commission. The summary of the case is that Mr. McCutcheon, a wealthy business man from Alabama, wants to eliminate the term limit that a campaign contributor could make to an individual candidate, a PAC (Political Action Committee), or a political party. Of course, the republicans agree with this. “President Obama reprised his role as constitutional-scholar-in-chief, arguing that “there aren't a lot of functioning democracies around the world that work this way, where you can basically have millionaires and billionaires bankrolling whoever they want, however they want, in some cases undisclosed.”
(http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/361427/more-mccutcheon-v-fec-ammon-simon)

The Supreme Court has a complicated case that it has to decide on during the next eight months. Mr. McCutcheon argues that the term limit on political contributions violates his first amendment speech rights. He also argues that by term limit, the Supreme Court cannot protect our campaign finance laws from corruption.

My personal feeling about this matter is that no one individual person or group of people should be allowed through their massive donations to influence an elected candidate in their future political decisions. "If state aggregate limits are overturned, the door will open for that tiny fraction of donors to give more -- possibly much more," Edwin Bender, executive director of the National Institute said in a statement.
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/10/mccutcheon-v-fec-state-limits_n_4078149.html)

If the Supreme Court decides to rule in favor of Mr. McCutcheon, the decision will create a situation where a wealthy business man will donate ten million dollars to a PAC, which will distribute the ten million dollars within their membership to several hundred individuals, which in return will turn that money to one candidate, thus making the transaction legal. The future candidate will be very grateful to the original donor of the ten million dollars. "The question is whether the aggregate limits unconstitutionally inhibit the free speech of donors or are a necessary check on corruption, like a restriction on giving “a Maserati to the secretary of defense,” to cite an example used by Solicitor 
General Donald Verrilli (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/03/27/u-s-solicitor-general-donald-verrilli-did-not-do-well-does-it-matter.html)

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Week 1 EOC: My Voice

Hello fellow bloggers. Welcome to my Photography blog. My name is Arda Moon and I have a passion for art in every form starting from photography, to makeup artistry, and all the way to advertising. I first picked up photography when I went on a trip to the Middle East about 4 years ago. I didn't have the best or fanciest camera, but I didn't let that stop me. I knew that I had to capture and document the beauty of everything that I saw. After that I began to see everything as if I was looking through the lens of a camera. At that point, I knew that I never wanted to put my camera down because I had the power of taking something and turning it into a beautiful art form. From then on, I continued to take pictures but I wanted to become more serious about photography, so I decided to save up some money and buy my first Digital SLR camera. My general purpose is to come up with new and exciting ideas and to make a difference in art by making big statements. My goal is to effect people enough to where my message is the last thing they think about before they go to bed. I want to make an impact big enough to shake a lot of people and have them talk about it for months to come.